SysTools OST Splitter Alternatives and ComparisonManaging large OST (Offline Storage Table) files can be a recurring headache for IT admins, consultants and power users who rely on Microsoft Outlook. SysTools OST Splitter is one of several tools designed to split oversized OST files into smaller, manageable parts to improve performance, reduce corruption risk, and simplify backup and migration. This article compares SysTools OST Splitter to notable alternatives, explains strengths and weaknesses, outlines typical use cases, and offers guidance for choosing the right tool.
What OST splitters do and why they matter
OST files store cached copies of mailbox data for Outlook accounts configured with Exchange, Microsoft 365, or IMAP. Over time, OST files can grow very large due to message accumulation, attachments, or long retention periods. Very large OST files may cause:
- slower Outlook startup and search,
- increased risk of file corruption,
- longer backup and restore windows,
- difficulty migrating or archiving mailbox content.
OST splitters break a single OST into multiple smaller OST or PST files (or extract data into other formats), often allowing splitting by size, date range, folder, or item type. Good splitters preserve metadata (sender/recipient, timestamps, read/unread status, folder hierarchy) and reduce downtime during maintenance.
What to evaluate when comparing OST split tools
When choosing an OST splitter, evaluate these factors:
- Supported input/output formats (OST-to-OST, OST-to-PST, MSG, EML).
- Splitting options: by size, date range, folder, item count, or type.
- Preservation of metadata, folder structure, and item integrity.
- Performance: speed and resource usage on large files.
- Ability to handle corrupt or orphaned OSTs.
- Compatibility with Outlook and Exchange versions.
- Command-line or automation support for bulk processing.
- Preview, selective export, and search features.
- Licensing model, pricing, and support quality.
- Security and privacy: offline processing and no forced cloud upload.
Alternatives compared
Below are several commonly used tools and approaches to split or manage OST files, with a focused comparison against SysTools OST Splitter.
1) Kernel OST Split
Overview: Kernel provides a set of OST/PST utilities including an OST Splitter that splits OST by size, date, or folder.
Strengths:
- Multiple splitting criteria (size/date/folder).
- Straightforward GUI and guided workflow.
- Preserves folder hierarchy and metadata.
Weaknesses:
- Pricing can be higher than some competitors.
- May require Outlook on the machine for certain operations (check current build).
Best for: IT teams that want an established vendor with a broad Outlook-tool suite and clear GUI.
2) Stellar Splitter for OST
Overview: Stellar offers tools for OST and PST repair and management, including splitting utilities.
Strengths:
- Strong reputation for recovering data from corrupted files.
- Options to split by size and date.
- Good technical support and documentation.
Weaknesses:
- Focused more on repair and recovery; split tool sometimes bundled with recovery products.
- Can be more expensive for occasional use.
Best for: Cases where corruption is a concern; teams that may need repair and split in the same toolkit.
3) SysTools OST Splitter
Overview: SysTools OST Splitter is a dedicated utility that offers splitting by size, date, folder and conversion to PST/MSG/EML depending on the product version.
Strengths:
- Flexible splitting options (size/date/folder/item type).
- Maintains folder structure and metadata.
- User-friendly interface and batch processing capabilities.
- Typically performs well on large files.
Weaknesses:
- Licensing and exact feature set vary by edition — compare editions before purchase.
- Some advanced features (like command-line automation) may be limited or require other products.
Best for: Administrators needing a focused OST-splitting tool with a friendly UI and practical splitting options.
4) Aryson OST Splitter
Overview: Aryson provides OST splitters and other mailbox tools, supporting split by size/date/folder and conversion options.
Strengths:
- Competitive pricing.
- Simple interface and common splitting modes.
- Offers preview and selective splitting.
Weaknesses:
- Feature set may be lighter compared to top-tier vendors.
- Support and documentation quality can vary.
Best for: Small teams and individual users who need straightforward splitting without advanced enterprise features.
5) Manual/Native approaches (Outlook mailbox management)
Overview: Instead of third-party splitters, you can archive messages manually within Outlook (AutoArchive, Move to PST), or recreate profiles to generate new OST files.
Strengths:
- No extra software cost.
- Full control over what to move or archive.
- Uses Microsoft-supported methods.
Weaknesses:
- Time-consuming and error-prone on large mailboxes.
- AutoArchive can be limited (may not preserve exact folder structure and metadata in the same way).
- Doesn’t directly split an existing OST file into multiple usable OSTs; usually results in PST creation or server-side cleanup.
Best for: Organizations that prefer native Microsoft tools, have small mailboxes, or want to avoid third-party licensing.
Feature matrix — quick comparison
| Feature / Tool | SysTools OST Splitter | Kernel OST Split | Stellar Splitter | Aryson OST Split | Native Outlook |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Split by size | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Partial (manual) |
| Split by date | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Partial |
| Split by folder | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes (manual) |
| Output to PST/MSG/EML | Yes (varies by edition) | Yes | Yes | Yes | PST (manual) |
| Preserve metadata & folder structure | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Varies |
| Handle corrupted OSTs | Limited (depends on file) | Moderate | Strong | Moderate | No |
| Batch processing | Yes | Yes | Limited | Limited | No |
| Command-line automation | Limited | Varies | Varies | Limited | No |
| Cost | Mid | Mid-High | Mid-High | Low-Mid | Free (time cost) |
Performance, reliability and data integrity
- For simple, healthy OST files most modern splitters (SysTools, Kernel, Stellar, Aryson) handle splitting reliably while preserving metadata and folder hierarchies.
- If the OST is corrupt or orphaned, prioritize a product known for repair capabilities (Stellar or Kernel) or run a repair utility first (ScanPST or vendor repair tools).
- Always test the chosen tool on a copy of the OST; do not run first-time operations on production files.
- Check whether the tool requires Outlook installed or whether it works standalone (important for server or locked-profile scenarios).
Pricing and licensing considerations
- Vendors typically offer trial versions with size limitations or preview-only functionality. Use trials to confirm feature parity.
- Licensing models differ: per-machine, per-user, or perpetual vs subscription. For large-scale deployments, ask about volume discounts, site licenses, or enterprise bundles.
- Support and update policies are important if you rely on the tool for ongoing mailbox maintenance.
Recommended selection process
- Define your needs: Are you splitting healthy OSTs by size/date for performance, or recovering/splitting corrupted files?
- Test: Use trial versions on copies of representative OST files to validate splitting options and output integrity.
- Check automation: If you’ll process many files, verify batch processing or command-line options.
- Validate output: Open resulting PST/OST/EML files in Outlook or a viewer to confirm metadata, folder structure, and item readability.
- Evaluate support and cost: Consider vendor reputation, documentation and support SLA.
Example real-world scenarios
- Enterprise IT: Regularly splitting large archived OSTs for long-term storage — choose tools with batch processing and command-line support.
- MSP or consultant: Handling a mix of corrupted and large OSTs — prefer vendors offering repair + split features.
- Individual user: One-off splitting to reduce Outlook lag — a simple, low-cost splitter or manual PST archiving may suffice.
Final recommendation
- For a focused OST-splitting task with a balanced feature set and good UI, SysTools OST Splitter is a solid choice.
- If corruption recovery is a likely requirement, prefer Stellar or Kernel for stronger repair capabilities.
- For budget-conscious users who only need basic splitting, Aryson or manual Outlook archiving may be adequate.
Test on copies, confirm the exact edition’s features before purchase, and ensure you have backups.
Leave a Reply