What Is GETL? A Beginner’s Guide to the Term and Its UsesGETL is an acronym you may encounter in data engineering discussions. At a high level, GETL stands for Get, Extract, Transform, and Load — a variation on the more familiar ETL process with an explicit initial “Get” step. This article explains what each step means, why adding “Get” can matter, where GETL fits in modern data architectures, practical examples, tools and patterns, and best practices for implementing it.
Why the additional “Get” step?
Traditional ETL stands for Extract, Transform, Load. ETL presumes you can extract data directly from a source in a form you can work with. GETL adds an explicit “Get” phase before extraction to emphasize the preparatory actions often required to access, stage, or collect raw data. The “Get” step can include:
- Authenticating to APIs or remote services
- Pulling files from SFTP, cloud object storage, or email attachments
- Triggering data exports from legacy systems
- Collecting streaming events into a staging buffer
- Downloading publicly available datasets
By separating “Get” from “Extract,” GETL highlights that acquiring raw data often involves operational complexity (scheduling, retries, encryption, network issues) distinct from transforming its content.
The four GETL stages explained
- Get
- Purpose: Acquire or retrieve the raw data artifacts you will process.
- Typical activities: connecting to remote endpoints, authenticating, downloading files, subscribing to message streams, or orchestrating exports from vendor systems.
- Output: Raw files, message batches, or staged datasets ready for structural extraction.
- Extract
- Purpose: Parse or read the raw artifacts into a structured representation (rows, JSON objects, tables).
- Typical activities: parsing CSVs, decoding Avro/Parquet, decompressing archives, converting Excel sheets to tabular data, or converting binary blobs into structured records.
- Output: Structured data (tables, records, or semi-structured objects) in memory or staging tables.
- Transform
- Purpose: Clean, enrich, normalize, and reshape the extracted data for downstream use.
- Typical activities: deduplication, type coercion, normalization of values (dates, currencies), lookups/enrichments, pivoting/unpivoting, applying business rules, and aggregations.
- Output: Analytics-ready datasets, dimension and fact tables, validated rows.
- Load
- Purpose: Persist transformed data to its destination(s).
- Typical activities: bulk inserts into data warehouses, writing to cloud object stores, pushing to downstream APIs, or loading into data marts or BI systems.
- Output: Data available for reporting, ML, or operational use.
How GETL differs from ETL and ELT
- ETL (Extract, Transform, Load): Assumes you can extract directly from sources; transformation occurs before load.
- ELT (Extract, Load, Transform): Extract then load raw data into a target system (often a modern cloud data warehouse) and perform transformations there.
- GETL: Adds an explicit acquisition step to handle operational concerns before extraction.
When to prefer GETL labeling:
- Complex acquisition (rate limits, authentication, multiple protocols).
- Need to centralize staging and retry logic.
- Hybrid workflows using both streaming and batch sources.
Where GETL fits in modern architectures
- Data lake + warehouse pipelines: GETL helps standardize how raw files or stream segments are collected and fed into lakes or raw zones.
- Event-driven systems: “Get” can represent the subscription and buffering of events before extraction and transformation.
- Hybrid legacy integrations: For legacy databases or on-prem systems where orchestrating an export is non-trivial, GETL makes the acquisition explicit.
- Machine learning pipelines: GETL’s staging phase gives teams a place to version raw data for experiment reproducibility.
Common tools and technologies used in each phase
- Get: curl, SFTP clients, cloud SDKs (AWS S3, GCS), Airbyte connectors, custom API clients, message brokers (Kafka, RabbitMQ) for collection.
- Extract: Pandas, Apache Spark, dbt for structural parsing, specialized readers for Parquet/Avro/ORC, fast CSV parsers.
- Transform: dbt, Spark/Beam/Flink for large-scale transformations, Python/SQL scripts, SQL-based transforms within cloud warehouses.
- Load: COPY/INSERT to data warehouses (Snowflake, BigQuery, Redshift), write to S3/GCS, push to downstream services via APIs.
Practical GETL examples
Example 1 — Weekly marketing reports
- Get: Download weekly CSV exports from multiple ad platforms (via API or scheduled export).
- Extract: Parse CSVs into tables, standardize column names.
- Transform: Map campaign IDs to internal naming, convert spend to a single currency, deduplicate conversions.
- Load: Upsert into the marketing performance data mart for BI dashboards.
Example 2 — IoT device telemetry
- Get: Consume device telemetry into Kafka topics with buffering and schema registry.
- Extract: Deserialize Avro messages to structured records.
- Transform: Aggregate by minute, enrich with device metadata.
- Load: Write aggregated time-series into a TSDB or data warehouse.
Example 3 — Legacy ERP integration
- Get: Trigger nightly exports from an on-prem ERP to SFTP, with encrypted file transfer.
- Extract: Decompress and parse fixed-width files into tabular records.
- Transform: Normalize SKU codes, validate business rules.
- Load: Load into a cloud data warehouse and update inventory dimensions.
Design patterns and best practices
- Separate concerns: keep acquisition, parsing, transformation, and loading code modular.
- Staging area: always store raw inputs (with provenance metadata) before destructive transforms. This enables reprocessing and auditing.
- Idempotence and retries: design Get and Load steps to handle retries without duplicate side effects (use idempotent endpoints or dedupe keys).
- Schema evolution: use schema registries or automated checks in Extract to handle changes gracefully.
- Monitoring and observability: track latency and failure counts in each GETL phase; collect lineage metadata.
- Small, testable transforms: favor many simple staged transforms over one giant monolith.
- Security: encrypt data in transit and at rest, and manage credentials centrally (secrets manager).
Cost and performance considerations
- Network and storage costs in Get (large downloads), and Load (writes to warehouses) can dominate. Consider incremental pulls and partitioning.
- Compute location for Transform matters: transforming near the data (ELT in cloud warehouses) may be cheaper for large datasets; local transforms can be better for heavy business logic or when using GPU/ML resources.
- Parallelism and batching: tune batch sizes for Get and Load to balance throughput vs. memory pressure.
Quick checklist to decide whether to use a GETL-style approach
- Do sources require complex acquisition (APIs with auth, scheduled exports, proprietary protocols)? If yes → GETL makes that explicit.
- Do you need to keep raw artifacts for audit/replay? If yes → include a strong Get + staging practice.
- Are some sources event streams and others batch files? GETL helps unify collection logic.
- Is orchestration and retry logic non-trivial? Treat Get separately.
Common pitfalls
- Treating Get as an afterthought and building fragile one-off download scripts.
- Not storing raw artifacts (losing ability to re-run historical pipelines).
- Over-transforming in Extract (mixing parsing with business logic), which makes reusability harder.
- Ignoring idempotency, causing duplicate loads on retries.
Final note
GETL is not a radically different technology—it’s a framing that makes the acquisition step explicit and manageable. For teams working with diverse data sources, legacy systems, or a mix of streaming and batch inputs, GETL helps clarify responsibilities, reduces operational surprises, and improves pipeline reliability.
If you want, I can:
- draft an architectural diagram for a GETL pipeline tailored to your stack,
- provide a starter Airflow/Prefect DAG that implements GETL for a specific example, or
- list specific connector implementations for common SaaS platforms.
Leave a Reply